Startup Killer: the Cost of Customer Acquisition

In the many thousands of articles advising entrepreneurs on what they have to focus on to build successful startups, much has been written about three key factors: team, product and market, with particular focus on the importance of product/market fit. Failure to get product/market fit right is very likely the number 1 cause of startup failure. However in all these articles, I have not seen any discussion about what I believe is the second biggest cause of startup failure: the cost of acquiring customers turns out to be higher than expected, and exceeds the ability to monetize those customers.

In case you are not familiar with the importance of Product/Market fit, Marc Andreessen has a great blog post on this topic:  The Pmarca Guide to Startups, part 4: The only thing that matters.

In this blog, Marc argues that out of the three core elements of a startup, team, product, and market, the only thing that matters is product/market fit. I agree with Marc’s view that product/market fit is extremely important. However after closely watching several hundred startups that have failed, I observed that a very large number of these had solved the product/market fit problem, but still failed because they had not found a way to acquire customers at a low enough cost.

Business Model

I would like to propose that in addition to team, product, and market, there is actually a fourth, equally important, core element of startups, which is the need for a viable business model. Business model viability, in the majority of startups, will come down to balancing two variables:

  • Cost to Acquire Customers (CAC)
  • The ability to monetize those customers, or LTV (which stands for Lifetime Value of a Customer)

Successful web businesses have long understood these metrics as they have such an easy way to measure them. However there is a lot of value in looking at these same metrics for all other businesses.

To compute the cost to acquire a customer, CAC, you would take your entire cost of sales and marketing over a given period, including salaries and other headcount related expenses, and divide it by the number of customers that you acquired in that period.  (In pure web businesses where the headcount doesn’t need to grow as customer acquisition scales, it is also very useful to look customer acquisition costs without the headcount costs.)

To compute the Lifetime Value of a Customer, LTV, you would look at the Gross Margin that you would expect to make from that customer over the lifetime of your relationship. Gross Margin should take into consideration any support, installation, and servicing costs.


It doesn’t take a genius to understand that business model failure comes when CAC (the cost to acquire customers) exceeds LTV (the ability to monetize those customers.

A well balanced business model requires that CAC is significantly less than LTV:


Since the above two diagrams are so obvious, you may wonder why I have included them. The goal is give the reader a sense of the balancing act required to create a profitable business. Hopefully the value will become more obvious with the third version of the diagram that shows the different factors that affect the balance.

Another reason for stressing the point using diagrams is that many entrepreneurs have realized that since the web provides some amazing new ways to acquire customers at low cost, several new businesses have become possible. The only thing that you have to consider is can you monetize your customers at a higher level than the cost to acquire them.

The Entrepreneur’s Achilles Heel: Optimism

To be an entrepreneur requires great optimism, and a very strong belief in how much customers will love your product. Unfortunately this same attribute can also lead entrepreneurs to believe that customers will beat a path to their door to purchase the product. This frequently causes them to grossly underestimate the cost it will take to acquire customers.

A common scenario is an entrepreneur that has dreamt up a cool new service that they can offer via the web. As a VC, I have sat through many presentations like this, and in most cases the service is actually interesting and compelling. However in the majority of these presentations there is little or no focus on how much it will cost to acquire customers.  As I ask questions to understand the thinking, what usually comes out is something vague along the lines of web marketing, and/or viral growth with no numbers attached.

A quick look around all the B2C startups shows that, although viral growth is often hoped for, in reality it is extremely rare. When it does happen, the associated businesses are usually extremely attractive, provided they have a way to monetize their customers. (For more on the topic of Viral Growth, refer to my blog post on that topic here.)

Far more common is a need to acquire customers through a series of steps like SEO, SEM, PR, Social Marketing, direct sales, channel sales, etc. that will cost the company significant amounts of money. What shocks and surprises many first time entrepreneurs is just how high the numbers are for CAC using these kinds of techniques.

Some examples of CAC calculations

For example, if you are using Google Ad Words to drive traffic to your site, take a look at the following interactive spreadsheet. This example shows a cost per click of 50 cents, and the resulting website visitors converting to a trial at the rate of 5%. Those trials are then shown converting to paid customers at the rate of 10%. What the sheet shows is that each customer is costing you $100 in just lead generation expense. For many consumer facing web sites, it can be hard to get the consumer to pay more than $100 for the service. And this cost does not factor in the marketing staff, web site costs, etc.


(To access the spreadsheet, please click here.)

One of the more interesting things that this model shows is how rapidly cost of customer acquisition climbs If your leads require human touch to convert them, (compare cell B23 with cell B22.) This human touch can be as light as email follow ups, or as much as inside sales people doing multiple sales calls and demos. I have seen this cost vary from around $400 to $5,000 per customer acquired, depending on the level of touch needed.

Another shocking computation is to look at the cost of a direct field sales force:


(To access the spreadsheet, please click here.)

This shows is that it is not unusual for the cost of acquiring a customer to be as high as $100,000. This number is heavily dependant on the productivity of your sales teams. In the model above, this was set to 10 deals per year per team. Given the need to cover R&D and G&A costs, the average gross margin on a deal needs to be at least $150k.

Lessons Learned – Business Planning Stage

My advice to entrepreneurs working on a new business plan is to build a model similar to those above to estimate the cost of customer acquisition. This is going to show you the dependency on several critical variables:

  • Cost per lead
  • Conversion rates at each stage of your sales process
  • Level of touch required

Then compare this to your expected monetization. As a very rough rule of thumb here are two guidelines that you might find helpful:

  • LTV > CAC. (It appears that LTV should be about 3 x CAC for a viable SaaS or other form of recurring revenue model. Most of the public companies like, ConstantContact, etc., have multiples that are more like 5 x CAC.)
  • Aim to recover your CAC in < 12 months, otherwise your business will require too much capital to grow. (Banks and wireless phone companies ignore this rule, but they have access to tons of capital.)

In the early days of the business, you will not be able to accurately predict your conversion rates, and the viability of your entire business may depend on this. So I recommend building an execution plan that focuses on finding out what these numbers will be as soon as possible in the lifecycle of the business. Good numbers will enable you to raise funding easily, and bad numbers may indicate that this is not a viable business.

The good news is that if you can monetize your customers at a higher rate than the cost to acquire them, you probably have a great business on your hands.

Next Generation Business Models

Because a number of smart entrepreneurs realized the importance of lowering CAC, they created new business models such as Open Source, SaaS, Freemium, etc. that directly tackled the problem of acquiring customers. Some of the early B2B pioneers in this space were companies like JBoss (story here), SolarWinds, ConstantContact, HubSpot, etc. Once others started to see the success these companies were having, they started copying the techniques.

These new business models focused heavily on how buying behavior has changed because of the power of the web. Think about your own behavior: if you are like me, you hate having to deal with sales people, and greatly prefer to do your own research starting with search engines, and leveraging free trials, on-line videos, blogs, reviews, and your social network. To adapt to this, the new business models make use of a variety of techniques described below:

  • Extensive use of the web to drive lead flow. In particular, the best practices include using Inbound Marketing to build traffic, instead of paying for traffic with search ads. (Read Get Found using Inbound Marketing to find out more.)
  • Use of a free product or service to attract web visitors, and aim for a viral spread as they tell their friends. Examples of free products include Open Source software, services like HubSpot’s Website Grader, free versions of a SaaS service that have limited, but still valuable, feature sets, etc. For more info on this topic refer to The power of Free.
  • Use of a free trial, where the customer can easily download, or use a SaaS version of the full product to see if it works for them.
  • Leveraging the power of your customers’social networks to get viral growth where possible.
  • Use of the touchless conversion to convert trials to paying customers.
  • Using low cost inside sales when the touchless conversion is not possible.
  • Extensive use of software to automate all processes such as SEO, SEM, social networking, lead scoring, lead nurturing, CRM, etc.
  • Metrics on all aspects of the customer acquisition process to find out what can be improved.

These techniques are frequently referred to as the Low Cost Sales model, or as Sales 2.0.

Balancing Monetization with CAC

The way in which these techniques can work together with other techniques to drive up monetization (e.g. recurring revenue) are illustrated in the diagram below:


Lessons Learned – Ways to reduce customer acquisition costs

Conversion rates play an extremely important role in your customer acquisition cost. Anything you can do to improve conversion rates is obviously a good thing. For more on this topic, please refer to the Building a Sales and Marketing Machine part of this web site.

  • Consider using A/B testing to improve conversion rates. Web traffic can be easily split so that parts are fed to different landing pages with different offers, and the resulting conversion rates measured.

Look at the level of touch required to complete a sale. Some products are easily understood, while others may require a careful walk-through by a sales person. Sometimes, the customer will want a trial with their own data. With certain complex products, this will need an on-site installation by a sales engineer, which sends costs through the roof. Consider every possible way to minimize this. For example:

  • Create demo videos that answer every likely sales question.
  • List the common sales objections that come up in the sales cycle, and provide answers to these on the web site.
  • Try using customer references to avoid the need for a trial
  • If your customers are going to compare you to the competition as part of their process, consider doing this for them, with a section of your site that has a comparison matrix with appropriate check marks.
  • If you have a light touch sales model, consider setting yourself the goal of a “Touchless Conversion”, i.e. getting rid of, or minimizing the touch required to close the sale. As shown in the model, this has a huge impact on cost of customer acquisition.

Options for products requiring high touch

The toughest business models are those that employ expensive field sales organizations. The high salaries and commissions for sales people, sales engineers, travel costs, and office costs add up to an extraordinarily high figure. And this is before you factor in the failure rate (the percentage of sales people hired that don’t become productive). It is not too surprising that VCs are not aggressively pursuing these kinds of businesses. There are some ways you can look to address the problem:

  • If you are currently using a field sales organization that sells direct, look at whether it is possible to sign up OEM deals with strategic partners to leverage their customer base and distribution power. What generally works best here is allowing the OEM to sell only a base layer of your product with co-branding. Then you can go back into their customers and upsell them. Owning the customer base is an important way to control your own destiny, and will also earn your company a higher valuation. In addition to distribution power, these kinds of relationships solve the “safe choice” concern of many buyers, and can transform your business.
  • Consider converting to a channel sales model at some stage in the lifecycle of the business. Many times this requires that you “prime-the-pump”, as most resellers won’t sell a product until they see clear customer demand. Channel sales models usually only work when the company commits to them fully, and passes all orders through the channel, so be prepared for the loss of margin this will represent to your current order flow.
  • Another option is to evaluate whether you can move from field sales to inside sales people. Insides sales people are not only less expensive in direct salary costs, but also in travel costs. Other advantages of inside sales people is that they are far more efficient due to remaining in one location, and can contact more people in a typical workday. At a minimum, look at combining inside sales with field sales to improve the efficiency of field sales people.


If you are entrepreneur planning your next business, you can’t afford to ignore the cost of customer acquisition. The earlier you work on this the better, as many of the best techniques require you to build your product differently.

It is also important to ask yourself the question: can my business realistically expect to acquire customers for considerably less than the amount that I can monetize them?

Once you have completed the product, you will want to familiarize yourself with all the latest techniques involved in the low cost sales model, or Sales 2.0.

From a funding standpoint, it is useful to know that your ability to raise capital will dramatically improve as soon as you have proven that you have a viable business model. Think of that as two equations:

  • CAC < LTV   (3x appears to be a rough minimum for SaaS businesses)
  • CAC should be recovered in < 12 months (for subscription businesses)

Once you have proven out the business model, hit the accelerator pedal, and invest as much as you can afford. You’ll want to grow the business as fast as possible before a competitor realizes what you have done, and tries to steal your market!

Follow on Blog Post

If you found this blog post useful, I highly recommend reading the following post which adds a lot of additional thinking around this topic: How Sales Complexity impacts your Startup’s Viability.


I would like to thank the management teams at JBoss and HubSpot, Gail Goodman of Constant Contact, Sheila Marcelo of, for contributing greatly to the ideas in this post.

- David Skok

Be Sociable, Share!
  • Pingback: Leitura Essencial para Start-Ups: 10 lições de Empreendedorismo

  • petercohen

    Excellent observations, David.

    I agree that some young SaaS companies grossly under-estimate the cost of customer acquisition. Even well-established providers like Taleo, Omniture, NetSuite and are spending more than 30% of annual subscription revenues on customer acquisition. Younger companies, such as SuccessFactors, are spending more than 80% on sales and marketing.

    As you point out, some young companies are spending inefficiently on customer acquisition, spending a dollar to earn 75 cents. I have also seen some companies that actually have built an efficient customer acquisition model, but lacked the capital or conviction to fund it. I call this the “Ferrari in the garage” problem.

    FYI, more here:

  • David Skok

    Peter, thanks for your comments. The data you have on your site is very interesting. We have compiled something similar, but with a different twist. I strongly agree that once a company has reached the point where it has a good LTV to CAC ratio, they should floor the pedal, and invest as fast at they possibly can.

    I found the articles on your site to be great. Thanks for sharing.
    - David

  • David Skok

    Mark, thanks for the input here. I have just gone out and purchased a copy of “Why Killer Products don't Sell”, as this is an area that I am passionate about.

  • Pingback: INEO » Para começar uma empresa: 10 artigos essenciais sobre start-ups

  • Jason Cohen

    Love this article!

    I have to argue with some of the marketing techniques marked as “lower cost.” For example, “inbound marketing” can be cheap if you mean SEO, but if you mean maintaining a quality blog that's absolutely not cheap — it takes a ton of time. It's invaluable to do — I'm not saying don't do it — but it's not cheap.

    Another example is “free trials.” Of course it's an excellent technique, but free trials comes with free tech support, and even if you have a great product people still have questions, run into problems, etc.. Tech support is not cheap.

    Of course in the end these are minor compared to the overall point that you need to honestly and objectively measure the true cost of customer acquisition, and most people don't. Cheers!

  • David Skok

    Jason, Thanks for the positive feedback. Your comments are entirely valid.

    When I used the term “lower cost”, I was referring to specifically these techniques versus other older techniques that I continue to see. The beauty of a blog, is that it can be written by the entrepreneur (e.g. Dharmesh Shah at HubSpot) in the early days to drive traffic, and it scales to large numbers without adding cost as the audience size grows. When this is used well, in combination with SEO, and social media engagement, I have seen it drive the costs per lead a lot lower than alternatives such as pay-per-click/SEM.

    The beauty of the free trial is that it also scales, as the customer is doing their own selling (assuming the product has been designed right). But you are right free trials require good tech support, and may need some sales effort to close. However I have also seen this lower costs compared to the alternative of long demos being given by SEs, and multiple sales calls. So I guess the term “lower cost” is all relative to the starting point.

    I appreciate your input!
    Thanks, David

  • Pingback: MicroISV Digest – 01/13/2010

  • Pingback: URENIO Watch: Innovation, Environments of Innovation, Intelligent Cities and Regions » Blog Archive » The Essential Startup Reader

  • Pingback: Designing startup metrics to drive successful behavior | For Entrepreneurs

  • Pingback: SaaS Metrics - A Guide to Measuring and Improving What Matters | For Entrepreneurs

  • abhishekpathak

    Thanks David for this article.
    CAC is something that is keep me up these days. I am in very early stage of planning for my venture and have my first meeting with a VC in 2 days. Although I am meeting him for advice and not for funding (as its arranged by my Univ) I am taking it seriously. I am working on a SaaS venture and CAC is challenging the entire plan.
    How do you look at outsourcing your sales team to an agency? Would look forward to your thoughts on it.


  • David Skok


    Outsourcing your sales to an agency could make sense in the early days provided that you could get really comfortable that the agency will handle your customers with the same degree of love and product knowledge that you would expect from insiders. In the long run, if you start to see success, I believe you will likely want to bring this in house (unless the agency has some significant cost advantage). The reasons for that are: control over the quality of the process, cost, and ability hear the feedback from the customers during the sales cycle. If you had an outstanding agency, it is conceivable you could get all of those, but if you going beyond telemarketing, or light touch situations, I am skeptical you will be happy.

    I hope this helps, and will contact you by email to see if you'd like other help.
    - Best, David

  • Pingback: Startup Opportunity Identification 2.0 « Nickpoint

  • Pingback: Social Sales » Sales 2.0 voor start-ups

  • Pingback: The Importance of Customer Acquisition Costs for Startups | Startup Life

  • Pingback: The Essential Startup Reader: 10 Lessons in Entrepreneurship - Business Technology Tips - David Dietrich's Business Technology Blog

  • darrollbuytenhuys


    Thanks for sharing your knowledge and experience. At go-ESI we work with early stage enterprise software vendors (primarily Israel based). The early challenges that we deal with are focused on market validation and acceptance. The companies that we work with typically have only a handful of customers when we first engage, mostly in Israel. Finding the first US or European customers and turning them into great references is our initial goal. Early stage companies have traditionally done this as an isolated activity that is opportunistic and rolodex based, with the founders driving the action. What we have witnessed are two possible outcomes — either they are so excited by their success that they continue in this mode until they either run out of friendly contacts or are consumed due to a flawed or non-existent business model, or the activity comes to an end when they achieve the goal of 5-10 reference accounts. Either way, they are forced to the planning table and the business stutters and stumbles while they try to figure out how to move forward.

    What we preach is that this reference customer hunting activity is possibly the most critical activity that they will undertake. We try to get them to plan around developing an understanding of what their customer acquisition strategy will be and then get them to constantly refine this as they engage with the early customers and truly learn what works and what doesn't. Our aim is to move them smoothly from market validation to customer acquisition. Thinking about all of the key issues mentioned in your blog is precisely what we want them to do.

    I would be interested to learn about your experiences in working with early stage companies and how they can avoid the stop/start enigma that so many of them go through. With product life cycles shortening, they cannot afford any extended slowdown after the initial push into the market.

  • David Skok


    I have not yet blogged on the subject of customer validation, but as you might gather, that is another subject that I am very passionate about. I agree that most startups do not focus enough on this, mostly because it is hard, and they prefer the easier work of building the product. Helping them to find those customers makes that job a lot easier, and is a highly valuable service. I agree that this is probably the most critical activity that they will undertake in the early days, and can save them from launching the wrong product, or cut many months off the time to get to product/market fit.

    The companies that are the most successful combine many interactions with customers throughout the product design and development process. Many times we will meet with technical founders that need to be paired with a business partner to help them accomplish this. We like to help them find the right business partner. CloudSwitch is a good example of this. We helped introduce the technical founder, John Considine, to Ellen Rubin, who became his business-focused partner. Ellen then did a spectacular job of finding customers and getting their feedback right from the early days.

    It sounds like your firm offers a very valuable service. Do you also do this in the USA?

  • darrollbuytenhuys


    We are actually based in the US and provide services in the US and Europe. The profiles of the go-ESI partners can be seen at

  • charlesdoucot

    When the solutions you sell require an expensive field sales force to gain traction in the market resulting in high customer acquisition cost, it is important that you choose your customers (and prospects) carefully. Without an understanding of a customer selection model for your specific business, you will have a hard time optimizing your routes to market and monetizing your solution.

    The “cost to serve” a customer has to be balanced against the profit margin that the customer can generate. You also need to take into account the lifetime value of the customer as noted in the article. If the customer is “costly to serve but willing to pay” because of the unique value your solution provides, a direct sales force is an option that will help prime the pump as you build an OEM and Channel model. Those opportunities that are more transactional or where there is no substitute in the market, that require little product customization or an installed base, can be served by a mix of lower cost inside sales, OEM sales, and channels.

    On the other hand, those customers/prospects who generate a low profit margin and are costly to serve will put you out of business quickly. The characteristics of these customers and opportunities include those where there is high pre-sales support required, high technical demands, extensive product customization, small deal size, and finally, no alignment at the customer on the core value of the product or serevice you are selling can be achieved. These are the “Dogs”, learn to recognize them quickly and run the other way.

  • jefflogden

    I love this post and it is oh so true. The cost of customer acquisition using outbound techniques is cost prohibitive and companies need to look for cost effective ways to attract and convert buyers.

    Jeff Ogden, President
    Find New Customers “Lead Generation Made Simple” (a young startup)

  • Pingback: How Sales Complexity impacts startup viability | For Entrepreneurs

  • alexgrachev

    It's quire comprehensive article. Thank you, David.
    One of the vital success projection criteria for any startup is the level of utilization of performance marketing model – tradition, such as CPA / CPL / CPS as well as new models such as PPD (Pay Per Deal).

    How to acquire customers with the highest MROI is the key strategic and tactical question to be asked.

  • David Skok

    Alex, that is very true. When looking at these performance based traffic generation channels it is also very important to consider what conversion rates to model. These vary greatly from business to business, but there are some rough ranges that can be used for estimates until real data is harvested. Thanks, David

  • Catheen Colehour

    David–can you direct me to sources of “rough ranges” that can be used for estimating CAC until post-launch test data is received? Thank you. Cathleen

  • David Skok

    Cathleen, Unfortunately there are no public sites that have this data nicely collected in one place. You would have to try to look at presentations from various companies like Dropbox and Xobni that have provided their information publicly. However if you can tell me the stages that you expect to have in your funnel process, I can try to give you some of the data that I have personally seen and heard about. I realize this may be confidential, so feel free to email that to me directly. (dskok at

    Here are some useful links:

    Best, David

  • Catheen Colehour

    David–can you direct me to sources of “rough ranges” that can be used for estimating CAC until post-launch test data is received? Thank you. Cathleen

  • David Skok

    Cathleen, Unfortunately there are no public sites that have this data nicely collected in one place. You would have to try to look at presentations from various companies like Dropbox and Xobni that have provided their information publicly. However if you can tell me the stages that you expect to have in your funnel process, I can try to give you some of the data that I have personally seen and heard about. I realize this may be confidential, so feel free to email that to me directly. (dskok at

    Here are some useful links:

    Best, David

  • air jordan shoes

    I am agree with landlord.Here provide many game for everyone . Wonderful artical excelling nature images. Let you have unexpected surprise. After you play game tired ,you can come to these websites to relax your mood.

  • Terence Pua

    I would further say that for SaaS that are using credit card subscriptions (i.e. touchless transactions), the CAC should include your infrastructure costs (storage, bandwidth, servers, etc.) for acquiring said customers (free 1GB, 3 users, etc.).

  • Pingback: Optimizing your Customer Acquisition Funnel | For Entrepreneurs

  • 505 Internet Marketing

    Acquiring new customers should be a priority in most all businesses and you offer a very thorough explanation of it. In a shorter version, we suggest a few questions for business owners to answer.

  • Ron

    Hi David! Another absolutely amazing article. Just a quick note: the embedded spreadsheets are not appearing for me – not sure if they are for others either, but worth checking.

  • David Skok

    Try using Firefox or Google Chrome. It works with both of those and they’re both really great Browsers.

    Best, David

  • samkidd

    This is such a great article, I have read and then re-read this, so much of what is said is just so obvious, yet it if often the very obvious and simple parts of business that get over looked at times.

    Thanks for sharing.

  • Steve

    Hi David

    Great information here, thank-you. The CAC is straightforward, but I am trying to establish a realistic LTV for our customers. We deliver an online service but currently sell a quantity of ‘widgets’ based on customer requirements (and due to short-term technical limitations). The service is not available from any competitor and is a radical departure from the current business practices. The rate of consumption of widgets varies by customer, and by time within a customer. Some renew at the end of consumption, some not, some return months later (without additional cost of sales). We have a few hundred customers ranging in size from a few thousand dollars/year to hundreds of thousands of dollars/year.

    We will be moving to a subscription model when we have studied consumption patterns further and fixed the technical limitations. Other than sampling over a period of time, I have not found a simple method to calculate LTV. Any suggestions? Am I wasting my time until we move to a subscription model and establish a pattern of renewal?


  • Moritz

    Great article, thank you David!
    I wish I would have read it some 12 months ago. But I am not quite sure if I would have done better, because we had to gain experiences to benchmark our expectations and to adjust our businessmodel. It was quite tough to finance this process because I needed these numbers to persuade the VCs. I guess this becomes easier, if you are a 2nd time entrepreneur.

  • RichN

    Incredibly helpful. CAC has been coming up more and more in my recent VC conversations…and I can see why. Thank you for taking the time to provide this insight. I, too, wish I had read it a year ago.

  • Chris

    I’m using Firefox 3.6.12 and I don’t see the spreadsheets either. Great post and would love to be able to access the spreadsheets!

  • David Skok

    Chris give me a little time and I will either send you another way to get to them, or the actual Excel spreadsheets.

  • David Skok

    Chris, thanks for highlighting this. I have fixed the problem. You should be all set to see the spreadsheets. (Somehow or another the code for the embed had been removed.)
    Best, David

  • 1st page killer earningsreview

    Nice blog.
    Thanks for this information.

  • Evan

    When you look at CAC, do you divide your marketing investments by all the customers acquired in a spending period or only the ROI on customers that you directly pay to acquire through program spend?

    I can’t seem to find this in the article, but I imagine that it’s the blended average that matters; that the ROI on each source determines the allocation of budget, but not the actual budget. So if you generate a lot of word-of-mouth business, you can afford to spend more on a per customer basis with program spend because you can average it with the near zero cost of the viral lead gen. But if you’re getting zero organic sales, then every customer must have a positive CAC. Or do you suggest that you ignore the organic business in your denominator and make sure program spend / program customers is positive CAC at all times?

  • David Skok

    Evan, Great question. The blended number is the right one to look at for CAC. However the other number, for paid acquisition customers only, is also very useful to understand. What I have seen with most businesses I have looked at is that when they increase their marketing spend, they usually end up getting an increase in their organic traffic, so the blended CAC remains roughly the same. However if you are in a situation where you don’t think that will happen, (i.e. more sales driven, than marketing driven expenditure to increase sales), you will want to know if you get a positive ROI on your paid acquisition customers before hitting the accelerator pedal and investing more in that area.

    So to summarize the answer: you should aim for a positive ROI on your paid customer acquisitions in all situations unless you are sure that your paid efforts are also directly contributing to your unpaid leads. Otherwise you don’t have a model that you can scale by investing more.

    I hope this helps.
    Best, David

  • Rags Srinivasan


  • Rags Srinivasan

    I agree with the need for understanding CAC and most of your arguments.
    Your model does fixed cost allocation to acquired customers. While SEM costs can be treated as marginal, the employee costs are not unless you are only including commission paid per customer.

  • Bill Flitter

    Great blueprint.

    I would add, if you do have a SAAS product that doesn’t require a lot of hand holding to get started, focus on improving the sign-up process including the landing pages, information on the website and balance quality sign-ups with ease of sign-up. We have seen big gains in changing simple words, adding a ‘how to’ video, removing steps in the sign-up process etc. This will lower your cost per customer dramatically. And remember, it is not one time thing, it is an ongoing process and requires constant tweaking.

    Also track each outbound advertising program you do. Make sure you know the cost per acquisition for Adsense vs. Facebook for example. Create specific landing pages if you find each audience responds differently.

    Happy New Year!

    Bill Flitter

  • David Skok

    Rags, I believe that the point you are making is that employee costs are a very significant part of CAC. I strongly agree, and make that point in the post, and in the spreadsheets. I have also covered that in this post:

    I hope I understood the point you were trying to make.
    Best, David

  • disney adventures

    Very Useful stuff, thanks for the post!!